MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390193057 · doi:10.1002/alz.079769

Rational design of a vaccine for Alzheimer’s disease using a computationally‐derived conformational epitope to selectively target toxic amyloid‐beta oligomers

2023· article· en· W4390193057 on OpenAlexaff
Johanne Kaplan, Scott Napper, Erin Scruten, Ebrima Gibbs, Juliane Coutts, Xubiao Peng, Steven S. Plotkin, Neil R. Cashman

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of SaskatchewanAmorfix (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitopeAntibodyKeyhole limpet hemocyaninELISPOTImmunologyChemistryImmune systemVirologyT cellMolecular biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Amyloid‐beta (Aß) vaccines have the potential to protect against disease but also carry the risk of eliciting proinflammatory T cell responses causing meningoencephalitis, and plaque‐reactive antibodies that can increase the risk of brain edema (ARIA‐E). To circumvent these issues and induce an antibody response that selectively targets soluble toxic Aß oligomers (AßO), without inducing potentially detrimental B or T cell responses against plaque or normal Aß, we used our Collective Coordinates computational platform to design a vaccine consisting of a conformational epitope of AßO, coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) as a carrier protein to provide T cell help. Method Mice received 3 immunizations, 4 weeks apart, with vaccine conjugate in alum or QS‐21 as adjuvants. Serum titers of total IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies to the peptide epitope were measured by ELISA. The selectivity of serum antibodies for toxic AßO versus monomers was evaluated by surface plasmon resonance, and plaque reactivity was assessed by immunohistochemistry on AD brain sections. T helper type 1 (Th1) and type 2 (Th2) responses to the peptide and to KLH were evaluated by ELISPOT analysis of splenic lymphocytes. Result A robust antibody response against the conformational AßO epitope was observed with both adjuvants and remained undiminished out to 6 months after the last immunization. Alum gave rise to a predominantly IgG1 response while QS‐21 produced a more comparable IgG1/IgG2a response. The serum antibodies showed the desired binding profile and reacted with AßO only, not Aß monomers or plaque. ELISPOT analysis showed a lack of Th1 (interferon‐gamma) or Th2 (IL‐5) cytokine production in response to stimulation with the AßO epitope thereby indicating that the peptide only contains a B cell epitope. T cell help was provided by the carrier and, as expected, stimulation with KLH induced Th cytokine production. Conclusion A vaccine consisting of an AßO‐restricted conformational B cell epitope conjugated to KLH produced a strong Aß antibody response with no measurable pro‐inflammatory T cell response against Aß. In addition, the oligomer selectivity of the antibodies focused the response on pathogenic AßO, potentially reducing the risk of ARIA‐E associated with binding to plaque and vascular deposits of Aß.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→