MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390194128 · doi:10.1002/alz.073694

Associations of white matter hyperintensities with cerebrovascular architecture in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias

2023· article· en· W4390194128 on OpenAlexaff
Ikrame Housni, Manpreet Singh, Mahsa Dadar, Flavie E. Detcheverry, Chloe Anastassiadis, Ali Filali‐Mouhim, Mario Masellis, Zahinoor Ismail, Simon Duchesne, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Eric E. Smith, Sridar Narayanan, AmanPreet Badhwar

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences CentreOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteUniversité LavalOntario Brain InstituteUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperintensityCardiologyDementiaInternal medicineMedicineVascular dementiaWhite matterFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryStroke (engine)Alzheimer's diseasePsychologyMagnetic resonance imagingNuclear medicineDiseaseRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background MRI‐detected white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), a marker of cerebrovascular‐pathology, are common in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRDs). In stroke, WMH‐volume was found to correlate most with stroke risk‐factors in the anterior cerebral arterial‐territory. Since the relationship between WMHs and arterial‐territories remains unexplored in the ADRDs, we systematically investigated WMHs’ spatial distribution (1) in 8 ADRDs relative to cognitively unimpaired (CU), and (2) across arterial‐territories per ADRD. Methods The extensive CCNA‐COMPASS‐ND cohort (N = 927) allowed us to investigate 9 clinical categories: CU, subjective (SCI) and mild (MCI) cognitive impairment, vascular MCI (V‐MCI), AD, vascular AD (V‐AD), Lewy‐body dementia (LBD), fronto‐temporal dementia (FTD), and Parkinson’s disease (PD) (Fig.1A). FLAIR and T1w MRI‐scans were used to segment WMHs (Dadar et al.,2017). Following registration to standard space, an arterial‐territory atlas (Schirmer et al.,2019) was used to calculate WMH‐volumes in 10 regions (Fig.1B). Statistical analyses were run on whole‐brain‐WMH‐volume and regional‐WMH‐ratios (region‐size‐normalized‐WMH‐volume/whole‐brain‐WMH‐volume). Data‐analyses used a series of linear models accounting for clinical category, age, and sex – followed by pairwise group‐comparisons corrected for multiple comparisons. Results 1) Relative to CU: Whole‐brain‐WMH‐volumes were higher for V‐MCI, V‐AD, and FTD. WMH‐ratios were higher in MCA and LMCA for 2 ADRDs (SCI;V‐MCI) and lower in PCA, LPCA, and RPCA for SCI. WMH‐ratios were higher in ACA or LACA and lower in PCA, LPCA, or RPCA for 4 ADRDs (V‐MCI;V‐AD;FTD;PD) (Fig.1C). Sex‐analyses: Men’s WMH‐volumes were higher in whole‐brain (CU;V‐MCI;FTD), while their WMH‐ratios were higherin LMCA (CU), but lower in ACA (SCI;MCI), LACA (MCI), and RACA (SCI). 2) MCA contained higher WMH‐ratios than ACA and PCA in all clinical categories. Relative to PCA, ACA’s WMH‐ratio was higher in 2 ADRDs (V‐MCI;V‐AD) and lower in 4 (CU;MCI;AD;PD). Pairwise‐group comparisons between all left/right arterial‐territories demonstrated consistent results (Fig.2). Asymmetry‐analyses: The right arterial side had higher WMH‐ratios in ACA (CU;V‐MCI), MCA (CU;SCI;MCI;V‐MCI;AD;V‐AD;PD), and PCA (MCI;AD). Conclusion We identified arterial‐territories of increased susceptibility to WMH‐formation per ADRD. The two most prevalent ADRDs (AD;V‐AD) were found to accumulate WMHs in a territory‐specific manner – higher WMH‐ratios in ACA for V‐AD and PCA for AD. Overall, the arterial‐territory‐specific WMH‐signatures identified may improve ADRD‐diagnosis accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→