MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390194228 · doi:10.1002/alz.079999

Fast accumulators of tau have higher levels of plasma pTau and stronger associations with amyloid in later Braak regions at baseline

2023· article· en· W4390194228 on OpenAlexaff
Stijn Servaes, Cécile Tissot, Joseph Therriault, Firoza Z Lussier, Nicholas J. Ashton, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Thomas K. Karikari, Yi‐Ting Wang, Jenna Stevenson, Nesrine Rahmouni, Alyssa Stevenson, Vanessa Pallen, Jaime Fernández Arias, Arthur C. Macedo, Tahnia Nazneen, Seyyed Ali Hosseini, Gallen Triana‐Baltzer, Hartmuth C. Kolb, Tharick A. Pascoal, Serge Gauthier, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaAmyloid (mycology)Internal medicineAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeAlzheimer's diseasePsychologyPathologyMedicineDiseaseOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Accumulation of tau neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) follows a stereotypical pattern, known as Braak staging. As individuals show different rates of tau accumulation, depending on their initial stage, this potentially biases drug effects on tau pathology over time. We hypothesized that amyloid would be a driving force behind tau deposition in later Braak regions for those that were at earlier stages of the disease. Method 79 individuals (CU: 57, MCI: 21, AD: 1) were recruited from the Translational Biomarkers of Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) cohort. All individuals underwent baseline and 2‐year follow‐up amyloid ([18F]AZD4694) and tau ([18F]MK6240) PET imaging, as well as baseline plasma pTau181, pTau217, and pTau231 assessments. Differences in standardized uptake value ratios between the two timepoints in Braak I‐IV were used to separate fast accumulators of tau from slow accumulators, using the standard deviation of a Young group (n = 13). Pearson R’s were calculated between tau deposition in Braak regions IV‐VI and the neocortical amyloid load at baseline, within both these groups. Furthermore, a voxelwise analysis was performed to identify specific regional differences in amyloid SUVR between slow and fast progressors, while correcting for age, sex, ApoE4 carriership, as well as the individual’s Braak stage. In addition, an independent t‐test was performed to compare the levels of each pTau species at baseline. Result Fast accumulators had stronger increases (p < 0.01) in tau accumulation in Braak region V and VI, compared to slower accumulators. Furthermore, the level of tau deposition in Braak region IV and V was positively associated (p < 0.01) with the amyloid load in the neocortex, but only in the fast accumulator group (figure 1). The voxelwise analysis confirmed that faster progressors had stronger associations with amyloid‐PET (figure 2). Furthermore, those who accumulated tau at a faster rate also had higher levels of plasma pTau at baseline (figure 3). Conclusion Tau deposition in later Braak regions is associated with a higher amyloid load and increased values of pTau181, pTau217 and pTau231 at baseline in individuals in early Braak stages that accumulate tau at a more rapid rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→