Voxel‐level of abnormal β‐amyloid accumulation and spatiotemporal distribution patterns in Alzheimer’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The spatial patterns of β‐amyloid (Aβ) accumulation are critical for early diagnosis and clinical trials of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). In this study, we explored a new voxel‐level Aβ index and investigated spatial patterns of voxels with abnormal Aβ deposition in different stages of AD. Method We identified 944 ADNI participants with Aβ 18F‐florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) image. All Aβ PET images were co‐registered with their corresponding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, intensity‐normalized to the whole cerebellum, and spatial‐normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. We defined the threshold of each voxel as the mean+2SD of 18F‐florbetapir PET images of 51 participants who were Aβ PET negative (A‐), CSF p‐Tau181 negative (T‐), hippocampal atrophy negative (N‐), and cognitively unimpaired (CU) at both baseline and follow‐up. The positive voxel number (NoVoxel+) was counted based on the threshold of each voxel. The cross‐sectional and longitudinal correlations between NoVoxel+ and cortical summary Aβ standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) were determined in A‐ and Aβ‐positive (A+) separately. We compared baseline NoVoxel+ among different stages of AD, as well as how it related to longitudinal changes of Aβ SUVR, CSF p‐Tau181, residual hippocampal volume (rHCV), temporal meta‐ROI cortical thickness, and preclinical Alzheimer cognitive composite (PACC) score, and follow‐up tau PET levels, controlling for age, sex and APOE4. Finally, we investigated the spatial patterns of NoVoxel+ in different stages of AD. Result The new Aβ index NoVoxel+ was strongly correlated with the cortical summary Aβ SUVR cross‐sectionally and longitudinally regardless of Aβ positivity (Figure 1). Cognitively impaired (MCI and dementia) individuals showed larger (p<0.001) NoVoxel+ than the CU individuals, A+ group had greater NoVoxel+ than the A‐ group (Figure 2). NoVoxel+ was related to faster rates of increases in Aβ SUVR and CSF p‐Tau, decreases in rHCV, temporal meta‐ROI cortical thickness, and PACC. Abnormal Aβ voxels were primarily located in precuneus, medial orbital frontal and anterior/posterior cingulate regions in A‐/CU group (Figure 3). Conclusion The proposed voxel‐level Aβ deposition NoVoxel+ may be useful to investigate the spatial and temporal patterns of Aβ accumulation in AD, particularly in early amyloidosis stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".