MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390194744 · doi:10.1002/alz.080482

The effects of ApoE e4 genotype on plasma p‐tau181 concentrations on clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to controls

2023· article· en· W4390194744 on OpenAlexaff
Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung, Pankaj Kumar, Ali Mousavi, Mary Joy Encarnacion, Hans Frykman

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsCenter for Diagnosis and Research on Alzheimer's DiseaseUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolipoprotein EGenotypingInternal medicineAlleleMedicineGastroenterologyAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeGenotypeCohortAlzheimer's diseaseDiseasePathologyEndocrinologyChemistryBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The association between ApoE e4, a powerful genetic risk factor for AD, and beta‐amyloid (Aβ) pathology has been reported, but the evidence for the correlation with tau pathology is not as clear. The current study examined the relationship between ApoE e4 allele and plasma concentrations of p‐tau181 in patients with clinically diagnosed AD compared with an age‐matched controls with normal cognitive function. Method We examined 302 EDTA plasma samples of patients assessed at the UBC Hospital Clinic for Alzheimer’s disease. The cohort was clinically characterized as controls (n = 59) if no significant cognitive impairment was found, and AD (n = 243) if they fulfilled the NIA‐AA criteria (McKhann 2011). The plasma ptau‐181 levels were measured using an ADx‐developed p‐tau181‐specific Simoa assay. ApoE genotyping was performed on extracted DNA from blood samples. We examined the association of presence of ApoE e4 allele and plasma p‐tau181 concentrations using two‐by‐two ANOVA using SPSS 29. Result The plasma concentrations of p‐tau181 in AD who are ApoE e4 carriers (75.4 pg/ml) were slightly higher than but not significantly different from in AD non‐ ApoE4 carriers (70.1 pg/ml) (p = 0.64). The plasma levels of ptau‐181 in control cases with and without the ApoE allele were 24.8 and 24 pg/ml respectively (p = 1.000). There was no statistical significant interaction between the effects of AD and ApoE e4 carrier status on plasma p‐tau181 (F (1, 298) = 0.21, p = 0.65, ηp2 = 0.001). Conclusion While the plasma p‐tau181 concentrations were significantly higher in AD groups compared to controls (p<0.001) it was no significant effect of ApoE e4 genotype on the levels of plasma p‐tau181 in the control or AD groups (p = 0.94, p = 0.21). This suggests that the ApoE e4 carrier status does not affect plasma p‐tau181 concentrations significantly, independent of the AD clinical status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→