MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390195340 · doi:10.1002/alz.073077

Unique CSF lipid signature in asymptomatic subjects with a parental history of Alzheimer’s disease and its association with key apolipoprotein species

2023· article· en· W4390195340 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Labonté, Cynthia Picard, Judes Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolipoprotein BAsymptomaticChemistryApolipoprotein EBody mass indexInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryMedicineDiseaseCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background CSF apolipoproteins exhibit lipid‐specific relationships (signatures) with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathological markers and APOE‐ε4 in asymptomatic individuals. Method Mass spectrometry‐based CSF lipid analysis was performed as described before (Sampaio et al. 2011). Lipids were extracted using a one‐step chloroform/methanol procedure. After extraction, resulting samples were analyzed by direct infusion on a QExactive mass spectrometer equipped with a TriVersa NanoMate ion source. Both MS and MSMS data were combined to monitor CE, DAG and TAG ions as ammonium adducts; PC, PC O‐, as acetate adducts; and CL, PA, PE, PE O‐, PG and PI as deprotonated anions. CSF levels of amyloid beta (Aβ42), and total Tau (t‐Tau) were measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (Fujirebio, Sweden) whereas apolipoproteins (AI, AII, B, CI, CII, CIII, D, E and J) concentrations were assessed using the Luminex/Biorad assays kit (10‐plex magneto‐fluorescent immunoassays, BioRad, USA). Results To characterize human CSF lipid signatures and their relationship to several apolipoproteins in pre‐symptomatic AD, we profiled and analyzed 21 classes of lipid species (for a total of 796 sub‐species) and 10 apolipoproteins in 120 cognitively unaffected subjects exhibiting various levels of total tau, p(181)tau and Aβ42. Figure 1 illustrates the signature profile (after FDR correction) following stratification by APOE‐ε4 genotype at the time of recruitment, when no cognitive deficit was detected. Please note the preferential associations between phosphatidylethanolamine acetate species and apoB levels in the CSF in non‐ε4 carrier. The apoD‐lipid signature profile was found to be very different in ε4 versus non‐ε4 carriers. Figure 2 illustrates the different associations between lipid species and the different apolipoproteins found in the CSF as a function of AD severity (stratified using the CSF T‐Tau/Aβ42 ratio). As ratio increases (top tertile) and pathology unfolds, the lipid signatures become markedly altered, with strong effects observed with apoB, apoD and apoJ interactions. Conclusion Our results suggest that early amyloid and tau pathologies modulate the release of specific lipid species in the CSF which alters their relationship with apolipoproteins in an APOE‐ε4‐dependent manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies→French-language works237,207→