MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390195958 · doi:10.1002/alz.071647

The Human Brain Nucleus Incertus: A New Target in Dementia?

2023· article· en· W4390195958 on OpenAlexaff
Camila de Ávila, Anthony J. Intorcia, Geidy E. Serrano, Crystal Suazo, Jennifer Nolz, Lauren Tallant, Julie Plamondon, Alexandre Caron, Thomas G. Beach, Andrew L. Gundlach, Diego Mastroeni

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy-related medical research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsal motor nucleusPonsGlobus pallidusNeuroscienceVentral pallidumHuman brainBiologyNeuropeptideNucleusPathologyInternal medicineBasal gangliaMedicineCentral nervous systemReceptorVagus nerve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The brainstem nucleus incertus (NI) or ‘uncertain nucleus’, was originally described by Streeter in 1903 as a midline region in the floor of the fourth ventricle of the human brain with an ‘unknown’ function. A century later, the NI has been shown to play a key role in memory formation in rodents, through direct and indirect inhibition of the hippocampus; and the anatomy of the NI and its projections throughout the brain have been systematically mapped in rats, mice, and primates, but not in humans. In these novel studies, we mapped the human NI using the neuropeptide, relaxin‐3 (RLN3), as neurochemical marker. In rodents, RLN3 is produced mostly in NI neurons with some subsidiary positive cells in the periaqueductal gray and an area dorsal to the substantia nigra. Methods Serial, free‐floating coronal sections of formalin‐fixed postmortem tissue were prepared from the pons of an adult female (aged 96 years) without a history of dementia or other neurological disorders, provided by the Banner Brain and Body Donation Program, Sun City, Arizona, USA. Using immunohistochemistry, we first identified the NI by mapping the distribution of microtubule‐associated protein‐2 (MAP2) and RLN3. The specificity of the RLN3 antibody used was verified in a dot‐blot using native RLN3 peptide. We also investigated the presence of markers detected in the NI of rats ‐ glutamic acid dehydrogenase‐65/67 (GAD65/67) and corticotropin‐releasing factor type 1 receptor (CRF1); and used a phosphorylated‐tau (AT8) to determine if the NI displayed tau accumulation. Results Detection of MAP2‐immunoreactivity revealed the neuronal distribution throughout the pons. RLN3‐immunoreactivity was detected in neurons in the dorsal, anterior‐medial region, revealing the broad anatomy of the human NI. Neurons within this same area were also positive for GAD65/67‐ and CRF1‐immunoreactivity, in line with previous studies; and AT8‐immunoreactivity was also detected. Conclusions RLN3 is present in neurons of the human NI and aspects of its anatomy are shared across species, including the macaque. Accumulation of phosphorylated‐tau in the NI suggests its possible involvement in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Further comparative studies are required to better understand the neurochemical anatomy of the human NI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicPregnancy-related medical researchFrench-language works237,207