MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390196983 · doi:10.1002/alz.081992

Neurophysiological activity linked to Alzheimer’s disease pathology relates to longitudinal cognition and progression to mild cognitive impairment

2023· article· en· W4390196983 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan E Gallego Rudolf, Alex I. Wiesman, Sylvain Baillet, Sylvia Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurophysiologyCognitionPsychologyMagnetoencephalographyPositron emission tomographyNeuroimagingMagnetic resonance imagingDementiaLogistic regressionAlzheimer's diseaseNeuroscienceCohortDiseaseMedicineInternal medicineElectroencephalographyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is defined by the pathological accumulation of amyloid‐beta (Aß) and tau in the brain. Regional deposition of these proteins is associated with changes in frequency‐defined neurophysiological activity that can be detected using non‐invasive magnetoencephalography (MEG). Here we examined whether these neurophysiological alterations were associated with participants’ demographics and longitudinal changes in cognition. Additionally, we addressed the clinical utility of MEG to predict progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), as compared to other established AD imaging biomarkers. Method We used Positron Emission Tomography (PET) to measure the deposition of whole‐brain Aß ([18F]NAV4694) and tau ([18F] Flortaucipir), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to measure hippocampal volume and resting‐state MEG to capture neurophysiological activity in a group of clinically unimpaired older adults with family history of AD (PREVENT‐AD cohort; n = 103). We implemented a multivariate partial least squares (PLS) analysis to test the association between imaging markers (i.e., neurophysiological activity and AD proteinopathy) and participants’ clinical profiles (i.e., demographic‐clinical variables and longitudinal cognition data). For the second analysis we used logistic regression models to assess the added value of neurophysiological activity to predict MCI progression compared to established MRI/PET imaging markers (n = 100; 14 MCI progressors). Result The PLS analysis identified significant latent variables that linked proteinopathy‐related neurophysiological activity slowing to older age, lower education, positive APOE e4 status and longitudinal deficits in cognition across multiple domains (Figure 1). The initial logistic regression model included demographic and clinical variables and had an AUC = 0.772, which increased to 0.794 after adding the MRI hippocampal volume. Incorporating MEG spectral power from temporal regions where tau accumulates resulted in a considerable increase in accuracy with an AUC = 0.873. The model including Aß and tau PET on top of MRI and MEG markers reached an AUC = 0.905 (Figure 2). Conclusion Our results show that the neurophysiological changes linked to AD pathology are associated with longitudinal cognitive impairment across multiple domains. MEG spectral power from early tau accumulating regions improved the accuracy for predicting MCI progression, contributing information beyond traditional demographic/clinical variables and structural MRI and representing a more accessible and less invasive alternative compared to PET imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→