Astrocyte reactivity is associated with synaptic dysfunction across the aging and Alzheimer’s disease spectrum, whereas microglial reactivity is specifically associated with synaptic dysfunction related to cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Healthy synapses are the key to proper brain function, ensuring communication between neurons. Recent studies have associated synaptic dysfunction with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) proteins, however, little is known about the role of glial reactivity, another pathology closely linked to AD, in brain synaptic dysfunction (Figure 1). Method We evaluated 123 individuals (67 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 56 cognitively impaired (CI)) who had available Aß‐ and Tau‐PET as well as cerebrospinal fluid measures of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), chitinase‐3‐like protein 1 (YKL‐40), soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), synaptic markers (growth‐associated protein 43 (GAP‐43), neurogranin (Ng), synaptotagmin 1 (SYT1), and presynaptic protein synaptosomal‐associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25)). ANCOVA adjusted for clinical diagnosis, age, and sex was used to compare levels of CSF biomarkers; whereas linear regressions adjusted for age, sex, clinical diagnosis, and Aß/tau‐PET were used to test the associations between glial reactivity and synaptic markers. Result Demographic information is shown in Table 1. Increased levels of GAP‐43, SNAP‐25, and Ng were observed in CI compared to CU individuals. CSF GFAP was highly associated with both presynaptic and postsynaptic biomarkers in CU and CI groups. CSF YKL‐40 was associated only with presynaptic biomarkers in both clinical groups. On the other hand, CSF sTREM2 showed an association with all synaptic markers but only in the CI group (Figure 2). Conclusion We found a heterogeneous association between synaptic markers and glial activation. The presence of GFAP+ astrocytes was associated with dysfunction of presynaptic/postsynaptic markers, whereas YKL‐40+ astrocytes specifically reflected presynaptic dysfunction across aging and AD spectrums. On the other hand, microglial activation reflected synaptic dysfunction associated with dementia symptoms. Our results support recent experimental observations suggesting that clarifying the heterogeneity of different glial cell phenotypes is crucial to advancing our understanding of the role of immune cells in cognitive decline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".