Individual bioenergetic capacity as a potential source of resilience to Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Brain glucose hypometabolism is among the earliest pathogenic changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This metabolic dysfunction points to the personal bioenergetic capacity, defined as the ability to maintain energy homeostasis under all circumstances including deregulated glucose uptake, as a potential source of resilience to the disease. Fasting blood acylcarnitine profiles are a central readout for this capacity in the absence of dietary glucose and capture the activity and efficiency of glucose‐independent routes of mitochondrial energy metabolism. Method We used fasting serum acylcarnitine profiles of 1,531 participants (465 with normal cognition, 762 with mild cognitive impairment, and 304 with clinical AD) from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative to perform unsupervised subgroup identification using hierarchical clustering. Identified subgroups were investigated for differences in A/T/N biomarker profiles and cognitive status. The contributions of genetic and potentially modifiable factors defining the subgroups were quantified using analysis of explained variance. The influence of the strongest determining factors on longitudinal cognitive trajectories was estimated using linear mixed‐effects models and gene‐by‐environment interaction analysis. Result We found several bioenergetically distinct subgroups with significant differences in AD biomarker profiles and cognitive function. The strongest genetic contribution to this bioenergetic endophenotype seems to be specifically linked to succinylcarnitine metabolism and significantly modulates the rate of future cognitive decline. In contrast, potentially modifiable sustainment of beta‐oxidation efficiency seems to decelerate bioenergetic aging, thus creating a bioenergetic reserve that delays progression of cognitive decline. Using gene‐by‐environment interaction analysis, we demonstrate that this molecular framework identifies a subgroup of individuals that is likely to benefit significantly from personalized therapeutic, dietary or lifestyle interventions tailored to increase resilience against bioenergetic disturbances in AD. Conclusion Our study reports on a set of genetic and metabolic markers that define bioenergetically distinct subgroups with significant differences on the AD biomarker and cognitive level. Longitudinal data suggest that targeting the modifiable fraction of this endophenotype might be a promising strategy to slow down disease progression in individuals with specific allelic configurations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".