Late‐life hypertension acts together with amyloid‐β pathology to promote early cognitive decline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Midlife hypertension (HTN) is a known risk factor for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) development. However, whether the same effect is observed in older individuals, at risk for AD, remains to be elucidated. Here, we aimed to assess whether late‐life HTN and the presence of amyloid‐β pathology (Aβ) interact to promote longitudinal cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals, and if systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels moderate this interaction. Interactive effect of disease pathophysiology is crucial for dementia prevention strategies. Method We used two independent cohorts. We evaluated 475 CU individuals over 65 years of age from the ADNI cohort, with available baseline medical data and CSF Elecsys biomarkers (Aβ1‐42 and p‐tau181), as well as longitudinal clinical assessments with neuropsychological testing (up to 6 years); the individuals were classified as (A)+ or (A)‐ based on a previously proposed cut‐off of CSF p‐tau181/Aβ1‐42 lower than 0.025. We also evaluated 162 CU individuals over 65 years of age from the TRIAD cohort with baseline clinical data and Aβ‐PET, as well as longitudinal clinical assessments with neuropsychological testing (up to 3 years). The individuals were classified as (A)+ or (A)‐ based on Aβ‐PET positivity. All individuals were classified as positive or negative for hypertension based on medical history. For the ADNI cohort, we could also evaluate the SBP levels as a continuous variable. Result Linear mixed‐effects (LME) models showed that HTN and Aβ acted together to promote longitudinal cognitive decline (ADNI: HTN X Aβ X Time, β = ‐0.44, p = 0.001, figure 1, TRIAD: HTN X Aβ X Time, β = ‐0.64, p < 0.001, figure 2). Also, we could see that higher SBP levels acted together with Aβ to promote further cognitive decline (SBP values X Aβ X Time, β = ‐0.011, p = 0.03, figure 3). Conclusion Our results support a framework in which late‐life HTN is a modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline in CU individuals at increased risk for AD. This supports further investigation in determining the best target of SBP levels for individuals at risk for AD, in the context of offering precision medicine for this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".