MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390199622 · doi:10.1002/alz.080569

A novel <i>Presenilin 2</i> mutation in two siblings with predominantly amnestic, early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease

2023· article· en· W4390199622 on OpenAlexaff
Carl Froilan D. Leochico, Ana Luiza Pinto Oliveira, Mario Masellis, Sara Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPSEN1PresenilinPedigree chartSiblingDementiaGeneticsMutationDiseaseAlzheimer's diseaseC9orf72BiologyMedicinePsychologyGeneFrontotemporal dementiaDevelopmental psychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Familial, early‐onset Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a rare form of dementia resulting from autosomal dominant mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin‐1 (PSEN1), or presenilin‐2 (PSEN2) genes with phenotypic diversity. PSEN2 mutations are rare and vary widely in age of onset. Method Case report and literature review. Result We report a novel PSEN2 variant (c.359T>G, p.Ile120Ser) that has been clearly segregated in two siblings in their fifties, presenting as predominantly amnestic AD. One of the siblings was also heterozygous in the PSEN1 gene (c.118_120del, p.Asp40del). There was no evidence of C9orf72 repeat expansion in either sibling. A third sibling has also started manifesting cognitive impairments. Their strong family history of cognitive dysfunction suggests that the PSEN2 mutation is pathogenic, and the causative variant has never been reported in Medline and the Alzgene genetic database of PSEN2. Conclusion As there are numerous PSEN2 mutations still incompletely characterized, there remains a need to systematically report patients either with familial or sporadic presentation and very early age of onset and classify their pathogenicity accordingly. Providing information about the genetic bases of AD can help allay the stress of patients and families about their diagnosis, individual risks, and possible care planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→