MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390199638 · doi:10.1002/alz.073787

Age‐ and sex‐dependent differences in cognitive decline in rat models of Alzheimer’s disease

2023· article· en· W4390199638 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah J. Myers, Austyn D. Roseborough, Brian L. Allman, Shawn N. Whitehead

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresenilinPathologicalCognitionPsychologyCognitive flexibilityDiseaseNeuroscienceAlzheimer's diseaseGenetically modified mouseCognitive declineAmyloid (mycology)DementiaMedicinePathologyTransgeneBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Memory loss has been a central focus of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research but executive dysfunction may be one of the earliest indicators of AD (Baudic et al., 2006). Executive function refers to a group of cognitive processes that are required for goal directed behaviours, such as working memory and cognitive flexibility. Amyloid‐β (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles are considered the pathological hallmarks of AD, but evidence suggests that these are not the earliest pathologies to appear in the AD brain (Sperling et al., 2011). This highlights the importance of assessing both the prodromal and more advanced phases of AD in preclinical modelling. This study aimed to characterize age‐ and sex‐related changes in executive function, learning, and memory across normal aging in rats as well as in two aging transgenic rat strains of AD: TgAPP21 (Aβ plaque‐negative) and TgAPP/PS1 (Aβ plaque‐positive). Method Male and female wildtype Fischer 344, TgAPP21, and TgAPP/PS1 rats were used in this study. The TgAPP21 rat overexpresses the mutant human amyloid precursor protein but does not spontaneously develop Aβ plaques, serving as an important model of prodromal AD. The TgAPP/PS1 rat overexpresses mutant human forms of both the amyloid precursor protein and Presenilin‐1 and does develop age‐dependent Aβ plaques. These strains allowed us to assess cognition under three conditions (i) normal aging, (ii) increased Aβ without plaque deposition, and (iii) age‐dependent Aβ plaque deposition. At 3, 9, or 15 months of age the rats were tested for spatial learning and memory, working memory, and cognitive flexibility using the Morris water maze, the 8‐arm radial water maze, and a T‐maze set‐shifting task. Result Age‐dependent cognitive decline was observed across all genotypes but was exacerbated in both transgenic models. Effects of age, sex, and genotype varied across the cognitive tasks, emphasizing the importance of assessing multiple cognitive domains. Conclusion These findings expand our understanding of the roles of sex, age and Aβ plaque‐positive/negative environments in cognitive decline in preclinical rat strains of AD. Overall, this work supports further investigation into the pathologies driving these cognitive changes and potential biomarkers for earlier detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207