MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390199908 · doi:10.1002/alz.072723

Sex‐specific neuropsychiatric burden distinguished by APOE4 status and cortical thickness

2023· article· en· W4390199908 on OpenAlexaff
Marc A. Khoury, Mila Valcic, Nathan W. Churchill, Luis Fornazzari, Moyra E. Mortby, Zahinoor Ismail, Vincenzo De Luca, David G. Muñoz, Tom A. Schweizer, Corinne E. Fischer

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgarySt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosterior cingulateApolipoprotein EAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeNeuroimagingInternal medicineAnterior cingulate cortexCohortPsychologyMedicinePsychosisOncologyConfidence intervalDiseaseClinical psychologyAlzheimer's diseasePsychiatryCortex (anatomy)NeuroscienceCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The APOE ε4 (APOE4) allele is a genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Prior work by our group found a significant association between the APOE4 allele and presence of psychosis as well as overall increased neuropsychiatric symptom (NPS) burden in female APOE4 homozygote AD patients, with no effect present in males. In this study, we sought to examine the relationship between APOE4 carrier status and sex on NPS burden from a neuroimaging perspective, with the aim to determine what brain regions may be driving this effect. Method A cohort of 752 AD patients were selected from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) database: 104 APOE4 homozygotes (40F|64M), 304 APOE4 heterozygotes (160F|144M) and 310 APOE4 non‐carriers (131F|179M). Presence of NPS was identified using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Structural T1‐weighted images were downloaded from the NACC imaging dataset and cortical thickness measures corresponding to frontal, cingulate, temporal and parietal regions were assessed. Statistical analysis included a Bayesian multilevel regression where cortical thickness was modeled as an outcome variable against an interaction between sex and APOE4 homozygote status (0|1), while controlling for heterozygote status, APOE4 non‐carrier status, age, sex and MMSE as predictor variables. Within‐ and between‐groups mean differences in thickness were measured as a probability density estimate (Highest Density interval), and partial correlation was used to examine NPI correlates to thickness. Result Female APOE4 homozygotes displayed a high probability (>90%HDI) of greater cortical thickness in the posterior cingulate and isthmus cingulate regions bilaterally and reduced cortical thickness in temporal regions (Figure 1). Cortical thickness in the fusiform cortex was positively correlated to greater NPI burden (p<0.05) among female homozygotes, and negatively correlated to NPI burden among female heterozygotes. Cortical thickness in males, regardless of carrier status, did not correlate to NPI burden in any region. Conclusion This study highlights an important relationship between the fusiform cortex and NPI burden in female APOE4 carriers, marking a female‐specific effect. Future work should further disentangle sex differences in APOE4 status and psychosis with a focus on the fusiform cortex as a potential region of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→