MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390200306 · doi:10.1002/alz.080202

Sex hormone binding globulin and total testosterone levels are associated with <i>in vivo</i> tau burden differentially between the sexes: findings from the Framingham Study

2023· article· en· W4390200306 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel F. Buckley, Emer R. McGrath, Matthew R. Scott, Gillian Coughlan, Rory Boyle, Mabel Seto, Saptaparni Ghosh, Heidi I.L. Jacobs, Claudia L. Satizábal, Emma G. Thibault, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Joanne M. Murabito, Reisa A. Sperling, Keith A. Johnson, Sudha Seshadri, Ravi Jasuja, Shalender Bhasin, Alexa Beiser

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSex hormone-binding globulinTestosterone (patch)Internal medicineDementiaFramingham Heart StudyHormoneEndocrinologyMedicineEstrogenPsychologyPhysiologyAndrogenDiseaseFramingham Risk Score

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In men and women, sex steroid hormones are associated with increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia. In older men, lower levels of testosterone are associated with higher rates of AD dementia. The relationship between estradiol levels on AD dementia risk in post‐menopausal women, however, is less clear, with studies reporting protective, deleterious and no effects. Finally, higher levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), a glycoprotein that regulates, and actively influences sex hormones, has been consistently linked with increased risk for AD dementia. Studies have yet to examine mid‐life hormonal levels in association with later‐life in vivo AD biomarkers in cognitively healthy adults. Method 175 women and 159 men from the Framingham Study 3rd Generation cohort underwent blood (hormones) collection in 2002‐2005, and 18F‐Flortaucipir (FTP)‐PET and 11C‐PiB‐PET scans in 2016‐2020 (Table1). We examined FTP‐PET signal (referenced to cerebellar grey) in six a priori regions that previously demonstrated sex differences (entorhinal, inferior temporal, rostral middle frontal, inf/sup parietal and lateral occipital). Linear regressions examined sex‐stratified analyses of free/total testosterone, estradiol, and SHBG in each region, adjusting for age, age2, PET camera and plasma‐PET date‐difference (mean = 15(±2)yrs). Separate models examined interactions with a neocortical PiB‐PET composite and APOEε4. Result In men, elevated SHBG was associated with lower FTP‐PET in entorhinal (p = 0.007), inferior temporal (p = 0.04) and rostral middle frontal regions (p = 0.02; Table2). Higher total testosterone was marginally associated with lower FTP‐PET signal in the latter region (p = 0.06), but other relationships were apparent. In women, higher total testosterone associated with lower FTP‐PET signal in inferior temporal (p = 0.05) and parietal regions (p = 0.04). Women APOEε4 carriers with higher estradiol showed higher levels of entorhinal FTP‐PET signal (p = 0.03;Table3). Conclusion Higher levels of SHBG are associated with lower risk of AD‐related comorbidities, such as osteoporosis, diabetes, and visceral weight gain. A strong link between higher SHBG levels and higher HDL‐cholesterol may suggest a potential protective cardiovascular pathway for men against higher tau burden later in life. A lack of protective effect of pre‐menopausal estradiol in female APOEε4 carriers supports the notion that the role of estrogen in AD risk is centered around timing of decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207