Sex and family history differences in Aβ and tau vulnerability in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Females and individuals with a family history (FH) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are considered at higher risk of sporadic AD. However, how sex and maternal/paternal heredity affects in vivo AD biomarkers is not well understood. Our objectives were to 1) assess if females or individuals with a first‐degree maternal FH of AD accumulate amyloid‐beta (Aβ) and/or tau faster than males or individuals with a first‐degree paternal FH of AD and 2) assess if both could influence the rate of Aβ driving tau in preclinical AD. Method Two hundred and thirty‐five older adults (age 68.3 ± 5.1 years, 69.8% female) from the PREVENT‐AD cohort, cognitively unimpaired at baseline, underwent [18F]‐NAV4694 and [18F]‐AV1451 positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Longitudinal PET scans were available for 106 individuals (4.3 ± 0.4 years follow‐up). We extracted and averaged the standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) in fronto‐parietal regions for Aβ and in temporal regions for tau. We performed t‐tests and ANOVA models to assess sex or maternal/paternal FH (FHsex) differences in Aβ and tau burden or annual change. We then performed linear regression models with an interaction term between Aβ and sex (or Aβ and FHsex) on tau burden and annual change, plus additional models to adjust for age and education. Result Sex and FHsex differences on Aβ and tau burden or annual rate of change did not reach significance although females tended to have higher tau SUVr at baseline (p = 0.053) (Figure 1 & 2). We found an interaction between Aβ and sex (𝛽 = ‐0.13, p = 0.008), and between Aβ and FHsex (𝛽 = 0.11, p = 0.03), on tau at baseline (Figure 3) suggesting that, for the same level of Aβ burden, females and individuals with paternal FH of AD had higher tau burden than males and individuals with maternal FH of AD. Results were similar when adjusted for age and education. Conclusion Females and individuals with a paternal FH of AD might need less Aβ before developing AD‐related tau, but did not accumulate tau faster. Identifying individuals more vulnerable to AD pathology, by disentangling sex‐specific effects, would help to design personalized interventions for AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".