MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390201008 · doi:10.1002/alz.073117

The AGED Triad: Opportunities for delaying dementia

2023· article· en· W4390201008 on OpenAlexaff
Frederico Pieruccini‐Faria, Elizabeth Finger, Vladimir Hachinski, Manuel Montero‐Odasso

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaMedicineApathyDepression (economics)Diabetes mellitusStroke (engine)Physical therapyInternal medicineCognitionPsychiatryDiseaseEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Apathy, gait impairment, and executive dysfunction (AGED) commonly occur jointly in the elderly, sometimes masked by the generic description of “late life depression.” The recognition of the triad is clinically useful because it often results from hypertension, which is treatable and preventable. Vascular risk factors, especially hypertension, can insidiously cause brain damage which may increase the risk of dementia in older adults. Hence the AGED triad can be a behavioral marker of cerebrovascular damaging which may lead to cognitive disability. It is unclear, however, whether individuals diagnosed with the AGED triad phenotype are at higher risk of earlier conversion to dementia compared with non‐AGED triad phenotype. We also tested the hypothesis that AGED triad would have better predictive capability than each of the three components separately. Method After baseline assessments 275 community‐dwelling older individuals (72.15±6.68 years of age; 58% women) from the Gait and Brain Study underwent face‐to‐face interviews every 6 months for up to 7 years (22.93±20.33 months; 6∼105). Gait performance was assessed electronically; apathy was assessed through the Geriatric Depression Scale‐3A; dysexecutive function was assessed trough the Trail Making test‐part B; dementia was diagnosed through the clinical dementia rating scale. Adjusted Cox‐regression models were used to determine early dementia risk in each exposure group. Result A greater percentage of AGED triad individuals at baseline had more than 2 vascular risk factors (p<.01) including hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, obesity and smoking history. Incidence of dementia in the AGED triad was 16.8% vs. 6% in the non‐AGED triad. AGED triad significantly increased the risk of earlier conversion to dementia compared with non‐AGED triad by 323% independently of the number of vascular risk factors at baseline. AGED triad predicted earlier conversion to dementia more than the three components separately (HR = 6.60 95%CI 1.48 to 29.46; p = .01; see figure 1). Conclusion AGED triad phenotype predicts earlier conversion to dementia compared with non‐AGED triad; and earlier than slow gait, apathy and dysexecutive function separately. AGED triad may be a behavioral marker of severe insidious brain damage over of an individual’s life course likely caused by unmanaged modifiable vascular risk factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→