A Quarter Individual Milking Machine “Stimulactor®” in a Camel Farm in Switzerland: According to Field Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the field study was to test the performance of the quarter-individual milking machine “StimuLactor” (ST-C) in a camel farm in Switzerland. Eight one-humped lactating dromedaries were used for this purpose. The camels were milked twice a day with a unit milking machine-StimuLactor for camels. The setting of the milking machine was as follows: vacuum level 36 kPa, pulsation rate 90 cycles/min and, pulsation ratio 65/35. In addition, the milking machine was equipped with sequential pulsation (25% offset quarter to quarter) and the teat cups are equipped with round silicone liners and an air inlet valve (Bio-Milker). Daily milk yield was recorded over a period of one year and milk samples were taken for qualitative analysis. The results have shown that after using the new milking machine no pathogenic bacteria were detected in the milk produced during the trial period. The examined milk parameters fat, protein, lactose, somatic cell count (SCC) and non-pathogenic bacteria (NPB) were in the physiological range and the concentration were 3.33%, 2,39%, 4.09%, 79000 cells/ml and 6150 b/ml, respectively. Finally, milking with StimuLactor has shown very good results, since this milking machine has been adapted to the anatomical, morphological and physiological characteristics of the camel’s udder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".