MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390237056 · doi:10.1021/acscatal.3c05405

Ligand-Enabled Nickel Catalysis for the <i>O</i>-Arylation of Alcohols and Phenols with (Hetero)aryl Chlorides Using a Soluble Organic Base

2023· article· en· W4390237056 on OpenAlexafffund
Kathleen M. Morrison, Nicholas E. Bodé, Samantha M. Knight, Jeongin Choi, Mark Stradiotto

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Catalysis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryArylCatalysisElectrophileNucleophilePhenolsLigand (biochemistry)Organic chemistryCombinatorial chemistryNucleophilic aromatic substitutionOrganic synthesisBase (topology)Nucleophilic substitutionAlkyl

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While ligand-enabled metal-catalyzed cross-coupling has emerged as a versatile approach to thermal C(sp 2 )–O bond formation, broadly effective catalysts capable of employing a soluble organic base have yet to be disclosed. We report, such a Ni-based catalyst system for the O -arylation of both aliphatic alcohols and phenols, that makes use of PAd2-DalPhos ligation and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) or tert -butylimino-tri(pyrrolidino)phosphorane (BTPP) as the base, in combination with a halide scavenger (sodium trifluoroacetate, NaTFA). This methodology affords a broad and expanded scope of (hetero)aryl ether products derived from inexpensive and widely available (hetero)aryl chlorides in a manner that is competitive with the best O -arylation catalysts reported to date for such electrophiles. Successful transformations of base-sensitive substrates that are incompatible with commonly employed NaO t Bu are presented, as are competition studies revealing a complex interplay of the electrophile, nucleophile, and organic base in directing selectivity for the O -arylation of aliphatic alcohols versus phenols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS CatalysisSame topicCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsFrench-language works237,207