PgxSAVy: A tool for comprehensive evaluation of variant peptide quality in proteogenomics – catching the (un)usual suspects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variant peptides resulting from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can lead to aberrant protein functions and have translational potential for disease diagnosis and personalized therapy. Variant peptides detected by proteogenomics are fraught with high number of false positives, but there is no uniform and comprehensive approach to assess variant quality across analysis pipelines. Despite class-specific FDR along with ad-hoc filters, the problem is far from solved. These protocols are typically manual and tedious, and thus not uniform across labs. We demonstrate that variant peptide rescoring, integrated with intensity, variant event information and search result features, allows better discrimination of correct variant peptides. Implemented into PgxSAVy - a tool for quality control of variant peptides, this method can tackle the high rate of false positives. PgxSAVy provides a rigorous framework for quality control and annotations of variant peptides on the basis of (i) variant quality, (ii) isobaric masses, and (iii) disease annotation. PgxSAVy demonstrated high accuracy by identifying true variants with 98.43% accuracy on simulated data. Large-scale proteogenomic reanalysis of ∼2.8 million spectra (PXD004010 and PXD001468) resulted in 12,705 variant peptide spectrum matches (PSMs), of which PgxSAVy evaluated 3028 (23.8%), 1409 (11.1%) and 8268 (65.1%) as confident, semi-confident and doubtful respectively. PgxSAVy also annotates the variants based on their pathogenicity and provides support for assisted manual validation. The analysis of proteins carrying variants can provide fine granularity in discovering important pathways. PgxSAVy will advance personalized medicine by providing a comprehensive framework for quality control and prioritization of proteogenomics variants. PgxSAVy is freely available at https://pgxsavy.igib.res.in/ as a webserver and https://github.com/anuragraj/PgxSAVy as a stand-alone tool.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".