MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390238980 · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.033

PgxSAVy: A tool for comprehensive evaluation of variant peptide quality in proteogenomics – catching the (un)usual suspects

2023· article· en· W4390238980 on OpenAlexaff
Anurag Raj, Suruchi Aggarwal, Prateek Singh, Amit Kumar Yadav, Debasis Dash

Bibliographic record

VenueComputational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersScience and Engineering Research BoardDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaTranslational Health Science and Technology InstituteDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsProteogenomicsComputational biologyQuality (philosophy)PeptideComputer scienceBiologyGeneticsBiochemistryPhysicsGenomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variant peptides resulting from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can lead to aberrant protein functions and have translational potential for disease diagnosis and personalized therapy. Variant peptides detected by proteogenomics are fraught with high number of false positives, but there is no uniform and comprehensive approach to assess variant quality across analysis pipelines. Despite class-specific FDR along with ad-hoc filters, the problem is far from solved. These protocols are typically manual and tedious, and thus not uniform across labs. We demonstrate that variant peptide rescoring, integrated with intensity, variant event information and search result features, allows better discrimination of correct variant peptides. Implemented into PgxSAVy - a tool for quality control of variant peptides, this method can tackle the high rate of false positives. PgxSAVy provides a rigorous framework for quality control and annotations of variant peptides on the basis of (i) variant quality, (ii) isobaric masses, and (iii) disease annotation. PgxSAVy demonstrated high accuracy by identifying true variants with 98.43% accuracy on simulated data. Large-scale proteogenomic reanalysis of ∼2.8 million spectra (PXD004010 and PXD001468) resulted in 12,705 variant peptide spectrum matches (PSMs), of which PgxSAVy evaluated 3028 (23.8%), 1409 (11.1%) and 8268 (65.1%) as confident, semi-confident and doubtful respectively. PgxSAVy also annotates the variants based on their pathogenicity and provides support for assisted manual validation. The analysis of proteins carrying variants can provide fine granularity in discovering important pathways. PgxSAVy will advance personalized medicine by providing a comprehensive framework for quality control and prioritization of proteogenomics variants. PgxSAVy is freely available at https://pgxsavy.igib.res.in/ as a webserver and https://github.com/anuragraj/PgxSAVy as a stand-alone tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputational and Structural Biotechnology JournalSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207