MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390244996 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104931

Clinical and genetic keys to cerebellar ataxia due to FGF14 GAA expansions

2023· article· en· W4390244996 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jean‐Loup Méreaux, Claire-Sophie Davoine, David Pellerin, Giulia Coarelli, Marie Coutelier, Claire Ewenczyk, Marie‐Lorraine Monin, Mathieu Anheim, Isabelle Le Ber, Stéphane Thobois, Florent Gobert, Léna Guillot‐Noël, Sylvie Forlani, Ludmila Jornéa, Anna Heinzmann, Aude Sangaré, Bertrand Gaymard, Lucie Guyant‐Maréchal, Perrine Charles, Cécilia Marelli, Jérôme Honnorat, Bertrand Degos, François Tison, Sophie Sangla, M. Simonetta‐Moreau, François Salachas, Maya Tchikviladzé, Giovanni Castelnovo, Fanny Mochel, Stephan Klebe, Anna Castrioto, Silvia Fenu, Aurélie Méneret, Frédéric Bourdain, Marion Wandzel, Virginie Roth, Céline Bonnet, Florence Riant, Giovanni Stévanin, Sandrine Noël, Anne‐Laure Fauret‐Amsellem, Melanie Bahlo, Paul J. Lockhart, Bernard Brais, Mathilde Renaud, Alexis Brice, Alexandra Dürr

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEpilepsy SocietyFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleAssistance publique-Hôpitaux de ParisAgence Nationale de la RechercheIpsenAlnylam PharmaceuticalsPfizerAustralian GovernmentEVER Neuro PharmaEU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease ResearchMerz PharmaceuticalsBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMedical Research CouncilBiogenEuropean Commission
KeywordsAtaxiaCerebellar ataxiaCerebellumAlleleGeneticsSpinocerebellar ataxiaBiologyNeuroscienceMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background SCA27B caused by FGF14 intronic heterozygous GAA expansions with at least 250 repeats accounts for 10–60% of cases with unresolved cerebellar ataxia. We aimed to assess the size and frequency of FGF14 expanded alleles in individuals with cerebellar ataxia as compared with controls and to characterize genetic and clinical variability. Methods We sized this repeat in 1876 individuals from France sampled for research purposes in this cross-sectional study: 845 index cases with cerebellar ataxia and 324 affected relatives, 475 controls, as well as 119 cases with spastic paraplegia, and 113 with familial essential tremor. Findings A higher frequency of expanded allele carriers in index cases with ataxia was significant only above 300 GAA repeats (10.1%, n = 85) compared with controls (1.1%, n = 5) ( p < 0.0001) whereas GAA 250–299 alleles were detected in 1.7% of both groups. Eight of 14 index cases with GAA 250-299 repeats had other causal pathogenic variants (4/14) and/or discordance of co-segregation (5/14), arguing against GAA causality. We compared the clinical signs in 127 GAA ≥300 carriers to cases with non-expanded GAA ataxia resulting in defining a key phenotype triad: onset after 45 years, downbeat nystagmus, episodic ataxic features including diplopia; and a frequent absence of dysarthria. All maternally transmitted alleles above 100 GAA were unstable with a median expansion of +18 repeats per generation (r 2 = 0.44; p < 0.0001). In comparison, paternally transmitted alleles above 100 GAA mostly decreased in size (−15 GAA (r 2 = 0.63; p < 0.0001)), resulting in the transmission bias observed in SCA27B pedigrees. Interpretation SCA27B diagnosis must consider both the phenotype and GAA expansion size. In carriers of GAA 250-299 repeats, the absence of documented familial transmission and a presentation deviating from the key SCA27B phenotype, should prompt the search for an alternative cause. Affected fathers have a reduced risk of having affected children, which has potential implications for genetic counseling. Funding This work was supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, grant number 13338 to JLM, the Association Connaître les Syndrome Cérébelleux – France (to GS) and by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 779257 ("SOLVE-RD" to GS). DP holds a Fellowship award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). SK received a grant (01GM1905C) from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany, through the TreatHSP network. This work was supported by the Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council grants (GNT2001513 and MRFF2007677) to MB and PJL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207