The Influence of Emotional Demonstration on the Smoking Behavior of Junior High School (SMP) Adolescents in South Sinjai District, Sinjai Regency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This research aims to determine the influence of emo demonstrations on smoking behavior among junior high school (SMP) teenagers in Sinjai Selatan District, Sinjai Regency (Theory of Planned Behavior Approach).
 Method: This research used a research method, namely quantitative research using a quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group design. The location of research and sampling was in the Sinjai Regency area. Samples were taken using the Accidental Sampling technique with as many as 250 respondents from the intervention and control groups. Analysis was carried out using the paired sample T test if the data was normally distributed and if the data was not normally distributed then the Wilcoxon test.
 Results: Show that knowledge (p=0.319 to p=0.689), attitude (p=0.032 to p=0.004), subjective norms (p=0.000 to p=0.087), and behavioral control (p=0.000 to p=0.003).
 Conclusion: It can be said that there is no change in knowledge and subjective norms in junior high school (SMP) teenagers in South Sinjai District regarding smoking behavior after being given emotional demonstration education and there is a change in attitude and behavioral control in junior high school (SMP) teenagers in Sinjai District South regarding smoking behavior after being given emotional demonstration education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".