Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada is one of the leading countries in ore production that involves variety types of ore deposits. Among the significant ore deposits found in the country, porphyry and volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits stand out as major contributors to the production of copper, gold, molybdenite, zinc, lead and many other essential minerals. Porphyry deposits are the major copper production in the country that are predominantly located in British Columbia, where subduction processes occur. While the overall mineral grade of porphyry deposits is relatively low, their immense tonnage makes them the largest reservoirs of copper in Canada. Notable porphyry mines such as Copper Mountain and Highland Valley Copper produce millions of tons of ore annually. On the other hand, VMS deposits, associated with volcanic activities, play a significant role in the production of zinc, copper, lead, gold, and silver. These deposits are distributed across Canada, with concentrations found in the Ontario and British Colombia. VMS deposits make up nearly a quarter of the country's copper production with significant mine sites including Kidd Mine and Windy Craggy. The future of the mining industry in Canada and the whole world should be focusing on sustainability. Sustainable mining recognizes the interconnectedness of environmental, social, and economic aspects and seeks to balance them for the benefit of present and future generations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".