<scp>SAM</scp> domain variants of <scp>EPHB4</scp> associated with aberrant signaling are linked to lymphatic‐related fetal hydrops and facial dysmorphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variants in EPHB4 (Ephrin type B receptor 4), a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, have been identified in individuals with various vascular anomalies including Capillary Malformation-Arteriovenous Malformation syndrome 2 and lymphatic-related (non-immune) fetal hydrops (LRHF). Here, we identify two novel variants in EPHB4 that disrupt the SAM domain in two unrelated individuals. Proband 1 presented within the LRHF phenotypic spectrum with hydrops, and proband 2 presented with large nuchal translucency prenatally that spontaneously resolved in addition to dysmorphic features on exam postnatally. These are the first disease associated variants identified that do not disrupt EPHB4 protein expression or tyrosine-kinase activity. We identify that EPHB4 SAM domain disruptions can lead to aberrant downstream signaling, with a loss of the SAM domain resulting in elevated MAPK signaling in proband 1, and a missense variant within the SAM domain resulting in increased cell proliferation in proband 2. This data highlights that a functional SAM domain is required for proper EPHB4 function and vascular development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".