MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390298771 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560603

Hybrid Optimization for Power Quality Assessment in Hybrid Microgrids: A Focus on Harmonics and Voltage

2023· article· en· W4390298771 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Prem Prakash, M. Venu Gopala Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsPower qualityVoltagePower (physics)Quality (philosophy)Focus (optics)Voltage optimisationElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringAC powerEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renewable energy's (RE) broad acceptance can be attributed to market liberalization, as well as ecological and monetary benefits.Intermittent nature of renewable energy (RE) and unpredictable load behaviour lead to voltage aberrations and harmonic distortions in interconnected hybrid microgrids (HMG).Voltage quality and the harmonic distortion are all metrics used to evaluate power quality.Efficient control approaches are required to reduce harmonic distortions and improve voltage quality for steady power transmission.This research proposes a hybrid Grey Wolf supported sparrow search optimization algorithm (GWSSSOA) method for assessing voltage quality and harmonics in a microgrid that combines renewable energy sources with conventional power generation.To maximize the microgrid's control and operation, guarantee its dependability, and lessen its impact on the grid.Hybrid microgrids can benefit greatly from GWSSSOA's use in voltage quality and harmonic distortion assessment.The goal of this research is to use the GWSSSOA technique in conjunction with the PID controller to achieve real-time optimization of the controller's settings for minimizing harmonic distortions and maintaining stable voltage across the microgrid.The efficiency of the proposed approach is measured against that of alternative optimized controllers.The recommended controller was developed in the MATLAB/Simulink environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207