MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390327933 · doi:10.3917/adh.135.0173a

Violaine TISSEAU, Être métis en Imerina (Madagascar) aux xix e - xx e siècles , Paris, Karthala, 2017, 416 p.

2018· article· fr· W4390327933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guy Brunet

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Démographie Historique · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

rEnDUS AnnALES DE DéMogrAPhIE hISTorIQUE 2018 n° 1 p. 173 à 203La formation de couples officiellement mariés impliquant des hommes européens et des femmes métisses ou malgaches ne se produit pas de la même manière dans la capitale, Antananarivo, que dans les villages reculés.Le niveau social diffère également : en ville, ce sont plutôt des milieux sociaux élevés qui sont concernés, le lycée faisant office de point de rencontre privilégié, tandis que, dans les villages, les hommes sont souvent des agriculteurs.L'étude des registres de mariages montre que les hommes, européens comme métis, épousent plus souvent des femmes malgaches que des femmes métisses.Encore faut-il rappeler que le nombre de conjointes potentielles classées comme métisses est peu élevé et, dans tous les cas, bien moindre que celui des conjointes potentielles classées comme malgaches.Mais il est difficile d'interpréter ces données car le nombre de ces mariages « mixtes » reste faible.Les femmes classées comme métisses 174 CoMPTES rEnDUS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Démographie HistoriqueSame topicGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesFrench-language works237,207