Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma in a Patient Previously Diagnosed With Sarcoidosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder characterized by granulomatous inflammation on histopathological evaluation. Diagnosis of sarcoidosis requires thorough elimination of malignancy and alternative causes of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation. Sarcoidosis and several subtypes of lymphoma have similar clinical presentations and can potentially have similar histopathological findings. Patients with a histopathology-confirmed diagnosis of sarcoidosis are at higher risk of developing malignancies. In this report, we present a case of a 64-year-old male diagnosed with sarcoidosis 2 years before presenting to the emergency department with a 4-month history of generalized weakness, cough, and very high fever. After a thorough workup involving cervical lymph node biopsy and bone marrow biopsy, he was diagnosed with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS). Due to the patient's current lymphoma diagnosis and features noted on pathology, a retrospective review of the prior biopsy specimen was performed, finding similar hematopathological features on both initial lymph node biopsy diagnosing sarcoidosis and current biopsies diagnosing lymphoma. Given these findings, our patient likely had early manifestation of PTCL misdiagnosed as sarcoidosis. In summary, lymphoma should be considered in all patients with suspected sarcoidosis, especially those who do not respond to treatment or who present with persistent hematological abnormalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".