MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390346601 · doi:10.1116/6.0003253

Mechanical and tribological properties of (AlCoCrNiSi)100−xNx thin films

2023· article· en· W4390346601 on OpenAlexafffund
Tongyue Liang, Sima A. Alidokht, Richard R. Chromik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandMcGill University
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFaculty of Engineering, McGill University
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanoindentationMicrostructureComposite materialCrystallinityThin filmAmorphous solidSputter depositionElastic modulusSurface roughnessWaferCoatingSputteringNanotechnologyCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High entropy thin films of (AlCoCrNiSi)100−xNx were deposited on silicon wafers using a pulsed DC magnetron sputtering technique, with nitrogen gas flow ratios (RN) of 0, 0.33, and 0.50. The structure and properties of these films were analyzed for elemental composition, surface and cross-sectional morphologies, microstructure, roughness, and mechanical properties. The coatings were primarily composed of an amorphous structure with a minor presence of a BCC structure and exhibited periodic variations in chemical composition from the substrate to the free surface. An increase in RN enhances crystallinity of the materials. Nanoindentation results showed that the films deposited at RN = 0.50 displayed the highest hardness (10.7 ± 0.5 GPa) and reduced modulus (176 ± 5 GPa), which were the highest among the films. Microtribology testing was conducted using a 20 μm radius spherical diamond tip under ambient air and normal loads ranging from 0.5 to 9 mN. Worn surfaces were characterized using atomic force microscopy. The coefficient of friction was evaluated to investigate the elastic and plastic behaviors of films using Schiffmann’s model. The coating without nitrogen displayed a predominant plastic behavior during the initial cycles, while the coating deposited at RN = 0.33 demonstrated a more elastic behavior, particularly at lower loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and FilmsSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207