MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390350619 · doi:10.14740/jcgo917

Postpartum Spontaneous Adrenal Hematoma

2023· article· en· W4390350619 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ana Claudia Lopes, Tiago Alves Pacheco, Maria de Lurdes Pinho, Ana Paula Brum Miranda Lopes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHematomaObstetricsGeneral surgerySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adrenal hematoma refers to an acute hemorrhage originating from the adrenal gland. When it occurs spontaneously, without an associated traumatic event (the most common cause), it is categorized as spontaneous adrenal hematoma. Spontaneous adrenal hematoma is a very rare condition, particularly during the postpartum period. Although a few cases of adrenal hematoma during pregnancy have been documented in the literature, no cases have been reported during the puerperium. We present the case of a 43-year-old woman who experienced acute right-sided flank pain, fever, and fatigue 3 days after delivering a baby vaginally. Following an angiography-computed tomography (angio-CT) scan to rule out thromboembolism, the radiologist identified a unilateral hemorrhagic mass on the adrenal gland. The management of this adrenal hematoma involved a conservative approach, which included rest and close monitoring to prevent rupture and adrenal insufficiency. Clinical diagnosis of spontaneous adrenal hematoma presents a significant challenge due to its vague and nonspecific symptoms, especially during the puerperium, as these symptoms can overlap with other common postpartum complications. Diagnosis is often incidental and relies on imaging studies. In this particular case, a high degree of clinical suspicion and a thorough diagnostic workup were crucial in achieving the correct diagnosis. Through this case report, we aim to raise awareness and provide a review of the current literature on this exceedingly rare condition. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2023;12(3):102-105 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo917

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsFrench-language works237,207