MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390354570 · doi:10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_225_22

Prevalence of Carotid Atheroma Plaque on Panoramic Imaging in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Systematic Review

2023· review· en· W4390354570 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arvind Muthukrishnan, M. Pavithra

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusAtheromaStroke (engine)Carotid arteriesReferralType 2 Diabetes MellitusInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hyperglycemia and other risk factors lead to the formation of plaques in the neck area of the carotid artery. Carotid atheroma plaque may predispose or increase risk of cerebrovascular accident. Panoramic radiographs can pick up mere calcified plaque and early referral to a physician would prevent long-term complications. Materials and Methods: The electronic and hand search of studies published until October 2022, yielded a total of 17 articles, out of which 4 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies examined the prevalence of carotid atheroma in panoramic images of patients with type 2 diabetes. The risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: This systematic review search yielded 168 publications from various databases. After reading the full text, four articles were selected and met the selection criteria. All four studies showed the level of evidence IV which was assessed using Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRO) guidelines. Conclusion: The prevalence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques is higher in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients. Literature-based evidence suggests that carotid atheroma can be detected on panoramic images and the patients can be referred to a doctor for further examination and necessary treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and RadiologySame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207