The early Eocene flora of Horsefly, British Columbia, Canada and its phytogeographic significance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
About forty species, including a bryophyte, ferns, conifers, Ginkgo, and over 35 angiosperms, are recognized based on compression-impression remains from the early Eocene of Horsefly, British Colombia, Canada. This flora is in the north central part of a chain of late early Eocene fossil assemblages known as floras of the “Okanagan Highlands” (= “Okanogan Highlands” in the US). These floras extend from north central British Columbia, Canada southeast to Republic, Washington, USA. The Horsefly flora shows similarities to other Eocene Okanagan Highlands floras, such as McAbee, Falkland, Thomas Ranch and Republic, but with some additional rare taxa. In the broader sense, the Horsefly flora can be compared with early and middle Eocene floras of eastern Asia and midcontinental North America, but shares fewer elements with Europe. Ginkgo, Metasequoia, Pinus, Palaeocarpinus, ulmaceous leaves and Deviacer are shared with northeastern China as well as western North American sites. Fagopsis, Macginitiea, Dipteronia, Florissantia, Sassafras and Lagokarpos also occur in other western North American Eocene floras and Koelreuteria and Jenkinsella with Eocene paleofloras of China. These comparisons demonstrate probable floristic exchange between northwestern North America and northeastern China via a Beringian route during the late early Eocene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".