Bibliographic record
Abstract
The teaching profession is made up of multiple issues. Teachers must plan their lessons, give their lessons, and evaluate the learning. But, as everyone in the college community knows, the teaching profession is not limited to these three tasks. Teachers should also be involved in program development and evaluation, the production and revision of master plans, and the development of lesson plans. They must select appropriate teaching methods for the different types of content they teach. They must also carefully choose methods to uncover the learning difficulties of their students, often specific to their discipline. They must finally accompany students on the path of conceptual and formal understanding of the discipline, despite their individual differences and varied learning goals. This list is of course not exhaustive, but all the activities listed there have one thing in common: they are all fundamentally didactic activities. Didactics is the discipline of the sciences of education which is interested in contents as school subjects, as objects of teaching and learning (Reuter et al., 2013, Tochon, 1999). Although it is first and foremost a university discipline, a component of educational sciences, didactics is profoundly pragmatic: It seeks to satisfy concrete and functional goals, with a practical intention (Tochon, 1999). As Réal Larose and Sophie René de Cotret, professors at the Universityof Montreal, say, "The didactics of a discipline can be developed in concrete action, in the same spirit as for some the path is made by walking "(Larose and de Cotret, 2002, 18). It is quite different for the teacher. The "male or female teacher" of school who did not have the same status as other professionals, today plays a growing role in the conservation and transmission of the values of our society. The highest court in the country has recently reaffirmed it; the teacher is a role model for both students and society whose values they must reflect. The teacher, in order to fulfill his role, enjoys the rights that he is entitled to under the legislation and, to a lesser extent, collective agreements. But to be a "model" also has important duties, particularly that of conveying, by gesture, speech, as well as by attitude, these values of our society. It is these rights and obligations imposed on educational professionals that will be the subject of this article. In this article, I propose a reflection on the rights, the place and the role of teachers in the school context at a time when many countries will be confronted, in the coming years, with a significant renewal of the Faculty Staff. It is the question of the professional identity of teachers that is at the heart of current questions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".