MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390364872 · doi:10.31540/jpm.v6i1.2608

PEMBERDAYAAN KADER SARISEJAYA DALAM PEMBUATAN PENCIL BOX BAMBOO DENGAN MOTIF BATIK DURIAN SEBAGAI UPAYA MELESTARIKAN BUDAYA LOKAL LUBUKLINGGAU

2023· article· id· W4390364872 on OpenAlexaff
Supriyanto Supriyanto, Isbandiyah Isbandiyah

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL CEMERLANG Pengabdian pada Masyarakat · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBambooHumanitiesArtMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tujuan dari kegiatan ini adalah kader Sarisejaya memiliki: (1) pemahaman terkait potensi dan upaya dalam melestarikan budaya lokal Lubuklinggau; dan (2) keterampilan dalam membuat pencil box bambo dengan motif batik durian. Metode yang digunakan pada kegiatan pengabdian ini adalah sosialisasi dan demonstrasi. Pada kegiatan sosialisasi mitra diberikan berbagai pemahaman mengenai potensi wisata budaya Kota Lubuklinggau dan upaya dalam melestarikan budaya lokal Lubuklinggau. Selanjutnya, kegiatan demonstrasi dilakukan dengan mengajak mitra untuk praktik membuat pencil box bamboo menggunakan motif batik durian. Berdasarkan hasil kegiatan pengabdian ini, maka diperoleh tingkat pemahaman peserta terhadap materi yang disampaikan oleh narasumber adalah baik sekali dengan persentase sebesar 76%, sedangkan nilai rata-rata yang diperoleh peserta secara keseluruhan mencapai 78,6. Untuk tingkat keterampilan kader sarisejaya dalam membuat karya pencil box bamboo termasuk dalam kategori baik sekali dengan nilai rata-rata keseluruhan adalah 85,02. Adapun luaran yang dihasilkan dalam kegiatan pengabdian ini yaitu publikasi artikel di Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL CEMERLANG Pengabdian pada MasyarakatSame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207