MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390370062 · doi:10.3917/ag.678.0221

Forest P. (dir.) Géographie du droit, épistémologie, développement et perspectives Presses universitaires de Laval, 2009, 275 p.

2011· article· fr· W4390370062 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jocelyne Dubois-Maury

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Géographie · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La région de Ségou, située au centre du Mali, dans la partie soudano-sahélienne et traversée par le fleuve Niger, se caractérise par l’importance de son activité agricole. Outre le cas particulier de l’Office du Niger, véritable « grenier à riz du Mali » (Bonneval, 2002), on assiste au sein de la ville de Ségou à des processus locaux de commercialisation d’outillage mécanique à destination des champs de brousse ainsi que des périmètres maraîchers et fruitiers situés le long des cours d’eau. L’étude des réseaux directs d’importation de matériel agricole entre l’Asie, le Moyen-Orient et l’Europe vers Ségou est à mettre en relation avec une demande accrue des exploitants locaux pour un équipement adapté à leurs besoins et à leurs revenus. Se dégage ainsi une typologie des différents importateurs et revendeurs de matériels agricoles à l’instar d’une classification des exploitations, qui utilisent cet équipement. La multiplication des jardins maraîchers et fruitiers pratiquant une irrigation moto-mécanisée, le long des berges du Niger et du Bani notamment, constitue un objet d’analyse singulier. Enfin, l’introduction de ces nouvelles dynamiques de mécanisation agricole entraîne une répartition spatiale régionale particulière ainsi que de multiples impacts techniques et sociaux au sein des familles d’exploitants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de GéographieSame topicMigration, Identity, and HealthFrench-language works237,207