MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390395432 · doi:10.18280/ts.400605

A High-Performance, Equus Jubatus-Optimized Deep Learning Model for Satellite Image-Based Change Detection

2023· article· en· W4390395432 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chafle Pratiksha Vasantrao, Neha Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquusSatelliteDeep learningArtificial intelligenceSatellite imageComputer scienceImage (mathematics)Remote sensingPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionGeographyBiologyZoologyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to detect changes in Earth's surface using satellite imagery is a crucial tool for monitoring and managing the dynamic terrestrial transformations.This process, however, necessitates the continuous refinement of techniques within the field of remote sensing.In this study, an advanced hybrid deep fusion model, underpinned by the Equus Jubatus optimization algorithm, is presented for effective change detection in satellite imagery.This novel fusion model is the result of a hybridization of pre-trained models, encompassing Fully Connected DenseNet (FC-DenseNet), Res-U-Net, U-Net, and SegNet, which collectively optimize fusion parameters.The Equus Jubatus optimization algorithm, central to this process, promotes rapid convergence while reducing computational complexities.This proposed model generates binary change maps from bitemporal satellite images, with experiments conducted using optical satellite images sourced from the Landsat satellite.Performance was assessed across three different databases, yielding an accuracy of 0.963 and an F1 score of 0.904 for Database 1, an accuracy of 0.895 and an F1 score of 0.812 for Database 2, and an accuracy of 0.819 and an F1 score of 0.862 for Database 3.These results suggest that the proposed model offers superior performance in comparison to existing stateof-the-art techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207