MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390398030 · doi:10.17580/nfm.2023.02.07

The influence of mechanical processing of chip waste from cast Al – Si – B4C composites on the structure and properties of consolidated billets

2023· article· en· W4390398030 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNon-ferrous Metals · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsForming Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialChipMetallurgyEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to increase the efficiency of material extraction during recycling of non-compact waste, solid-phase processing methods are currently being developed to reduce energy consumption in the manufacturing of secondary products. This study provides a comparative evaluation of the influence of high-energy ball milling of chip waste from turning ingots of AlSi12 + 10 vol.% B4C aluminum matrix composite on changes in the structure and mechanical properties of consolidated billets compared to compacted unprepared chips and as-cast state. It was found that the samples consolidated from powder are characterized by increased strength properties in comparison with the cast composite and chips pressed composite. Specifically, the yield strength of the powder consolidated specimens increased by ~1.5 and ~2.3 times compared to the cast composite and chips pressed composite, respectively. The hardness of the cast composite was 39.35 ± 3.2 HRB, while the hardness of the samples consolidated from chips and powder was 42.75 ± 1.2 and 71.4 ± 1.5 HRB, correspondingly. The observed mechanical behavior is associated with a reduction in the sizes of the structural constituents of the matrix alloy, fragmentation of the reinforcing particles, a decrease in the porosity fraction, as well as an increase in the uniformity of particles distribution in the volume of the powder-pressed specimen. The results demonstrate the potential of solid-phase methods for processing non-compact waste in the manufacturing of products from metal matrix composites. This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (Project № 21-79-10432, https://rscf.ru/project/21-79-10432/). The study was carried out using the equipment of the interregional multispecialty and interdisciplinary center for the collective usage of promising and competitive technologies in the areas of development and application in industry/mechanical engineering of domestic achievements in the field of nanotechnology (Agreement No. 075-15-2021-692 of August 5, 2021).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it