MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390404665 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.181223

Affordances of Home-School Journey in the Hinterland Area for Spatial Mobility Patterns

2023· article· en· W4390404665 on OpenAlex
Yusra Aulia Sari, Lee Yoke Lai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicKorean Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia
KeywordsAffordanceMobilitiesHuman–computer interactionComputer scienceGeographySociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In children's home-school journey, little is known about the geography of the outdoor environment in coastal areas, particularly in the hinterland area.This study investigates spatial mobility patterns during home-school journeys in the hinterland area through their actualised affordances at Belakang Padang, Batam, Indonesia.In this study, affordances refer to the opportunities and constraints related to physical and environmental factors that influence a child's ability to navigate and move within their surroundings, particularly when travelling to and from school.The study was conducted on forty-three children aged 7-12 who experienced two elementary schools in the hinterland of an island community.The phenomenological approach elicited a dataset of the children's behavioural responses derived from participatory observation, go-along interviews, and GIS mapping.The responses included physical movement, words, and phrases, which suggested their preferences towards the hinterland area settings.This study analysed the data in two stages: firstly, a taxonomy of the affordance of children's outdoor environment involves categorising different types of opportunities and constraints that impact spatial mobility patterns, and secondly, the level of affordances shows how the perceiver shapes and constructs the environment they are perceiving.Spatial analysis and content analyses revealed that the home-school journey offered 11 categories of environmental qualities, with the category of water showing the most affordances.The children's activities were most frequently on the jetty and muddy ground.The results suggest that children's affordances such as observing, recognising, watching, relaxing, scooping, swimming, diving, playing, speaking, paddling, practising, crossing, standing, touching, eating, floating, fishing, stopping, explaining, releasing, mastering, catching, asking, joking, telling, singing, planning, sitting, splashing, pouring, determining, knowing, boating, and standing to gain balance on the jetty and boat are facilitated through physical, cognitive, and social interactions.A deeper understanding of child-friendly places can help increase the affordance of other places in the hinterland area.Therefore, it is recommended that governments implement policies to foster a Child-Friendly City/District (CFC/D).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it