A short term analysis of external rotation deficit following a combined arthroscopic bankart with remplissage and rotator interval closure for anteroinferior instability with subcritical bone loss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Our study aims at assessing the clinical outcomes of our patients who have undergone arthroscopic bankart and remplissage along with rotator interval closure in the treatment of anteroinferior instability with subcritical bone loss, with focus on external rotation deficit. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study including 48 consecutive patients who underwent surgery Arthroscopic Bankarts with remplissage procedure for anterior shoulder instability with Hill-Sachs lesion. In our study, the minimum follow-up was 6 months and the average follow-up of was 21months. At the last follow-up, active range of motion, western ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) scores were assessed. Results: 48 patients who underwent surgery in the time period of 2019-2023 who completed minimum 6months follow up were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 31.7 years (range, 16-52 years), with 93.8% male patients and 6.2% female patients. The range of motion at follow-up was comparable with the normal side, with loss of terminal external rotation in 2 patients (4%). Average University of California at Los Angeles score was 30.7 and Western Ontario shoulder instability index was 3.8%. One patient had only one episode of subluxation and there was one case of infection. Conclusions: The results of our study validate the combination of Remplissage and rotator interval closure with Bankart repair in the treatment of anterior instability with glenoid bone loss <15% irrespective of tracking of Hill Sachs lesion for excellent functional outcomes, least rate of recurrence and without significant loss of external rotation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".