MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390430865 · doi:10.14740/cr1580

The Heart of Rett Syndrome: A Quantitative Analysis of Cardiac Repolarization

2023· article· en· W4390430865 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael P. Collins, Mark C. Johnson, Robin C. Ryther, Judith Weisenberg, Peter Heydemann, Colleen Buhrfiend, William Scott, Dallas Armstrong, Haley M. Kern, Hoang H. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQT intervalMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyRepolarizationRett syndromeElectrocardiographyLong QT syndromeSudden cardiac deathElectrophysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rett syndrome (RTT) is a developmental encephalopathy disorder that is associated with a high incidence of sudden death presumably from cardiorespiratory etiologies. Electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, such as prolonged heart-rate corrected QT (QTc) interval, are markers of cardiac repolarization and are associated with potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. This study investigates the cardiac repolarization characteristics of RTT patients, including QTc and T-wave morphology characteristics. Methods: A retrospective quantitative analysis on 110 RTT patients and 124 age and sex-matched healthy controls was conducted. Results: RTT patients had longer QTc, more abnormal T-wave morphology, and greater heterogeneity of cardiac repolarization parameters compared to controls. Even RTT patients without prolonged QTc had more abnormal ECG and T-wave characteristics than controls. Among RTT patients, MECP2 patients had prolonged QTc compared to CDKL5 and FOXG1 patients. A subset of five RTT patients who died had normal QTc, but more abnormal T-wave morphology than the remaining RTT patients. Conclusions: Cardiac repolarization abnormalities are present in RTT patients, even without long QTc. T-wave morphology is related to RTT genotype and may be predictive of mortality. These findings could be used to help the management and monitoring of RTT patients. Cardiol Res. 2023;14(6):446-452 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1580

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207