Deep brain stimulation for Tourette syndrome: modulation of the limbic-motor interface network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for medically refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). Several effective targets have been reported, but there is still controversy about the networks involved in the efficacy of DBS for TS. Here, the authors aimed to identify the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical networks associated with tic and obsessive-compulsive behavior (OCB) improvement and the network link between the two main targets for TS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 21 patients treated with pallidal and thalamic DBS was performed. Tics and OCB scores were recorded before and after DBS. The authors localized the electrodes in standard MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space and calculated the volume of tissue activated with the settings at the last follow-up to obtain areas of maximal improvement ("sweet spots") among all patients for the pallidal and thalamic targets. Tractography was used to show the white matter pathways associated with maximal tic and OCB improvement. RESULTS: Ten patients treated with pallidal DBS and 11 patients treated with thalamic DBS were included. Responder rates were 80% in the pallidal and 64% in the thalamic target groups. Sweet spots for tics and OCB clustered in several areas across the basal ganglia and thalamus delineated two main networks. Tic reduction in the pallidal target mapped to a limbic pallidothalamic network and in the thalamic target to the premotor thalamocortical network. Putting these two networks together will form the main output of the so-called limbic-motor interface network. However, OCB reduction mapped a dorsomedial prefrontal cortex/dorsal anterior cingulate (dmPFC/dACC) network. CONCLUSIONS: The authors demonstrated the involvement of the limbic-motor interface network during effective DBS for tics in patients with TS. OCB redution was associated with the additional involvement of dmPFC/dACC connections passing dorsal to the head of the globus pallidus pars externa on its way to the thalamus and midbrain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".