İnanç Gelişimi ve Kimlik Siyaseti Üzerine Yorumlar: Belkıs Kıssası Örneği
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fowler’s faith development theory is one of the most comprehensive faith development theories in recent times. Some data of this theory, which covers the life process of the individual, and some comments about identity politics were made through the story of Belkıs. The Qur'an not only wants to convey historical information about the events of the past period, but also wants to have been interpreted these historical events. One of these historical events is the story of Belkıs and Prophet Solomon. In this study, belief development and identity politics of Belkıs and her society will be evaluated in terms of belief development theory. Identity politics is a factor that affects the social development of the individual. Even the development of faith can be influenced by identity politics. Although identity politics seems to affect individual and social development in terms of religious beliefs, in some cases, belief development can also affect identity politics. Here is the situation of the parable of Belkıs, an example of this. When the parable of Belkıs is analysed, it will be seen that while the belief development of a society can develop depending on a manager, the belief development of that manager can determine the identity politics of her own society. If Belkıs did not want her society to enter a new religious belief in terms of identity politics and preferred to fight with the prophet Solomon, the society and bureaucracy that supported her would have also supported her. However, Belkıs preferred dialogue instead of war and adopted the new religious belief. Thus, the society that followed her accepted this new belief. From the point of view of Fowler's belief development, this attitude of Belkıs shows that she is in transition from the fourth to the fifth phase in terms of belief development. As a result, Belkıs did not have any difficulties in adopting a new belief since flexible belief was in the development stage, and her own society did not rebel against her policy. Key Words: Belief Development, Belief Development Theory, Identity Politics, Belkıs, Prophet Solomon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".