Diskursus Kesetaraan Gender: Realitas dan Idealitas Kepemimpinan Wanita Dalam Budaya Patriarki Organisasi Masyarakat Islam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wacana rekonstruksi kepemimpinan wanita dalam sebuah organisasi masih terus digaungkan oleh para kaum cendekia, terlebih kaum laki-laki yang dinilai telah bertindak bias gender terhadap kaum perempuan. Ideal yang kaum laki-laki semarakkan adalah konsep kesetaraan gender yang berlaku dalam organisasi masyarakat Islam bagi perempuan. Namun, pada realitanya konsep tersebut hanya bersifat formalitas saja. Pasalnya kaum perempuan masih tidak tersadarkan akan adanya ketimpangan gender dalam kepemimpinan organisasi masyarakat Islam. Mereka yang masih terjebak dalam zona nyaman, yaitu sebagai bawahan kaum laki-laki. Sehingga bias gender masih akan terus berkelanjutan bahkan kasus-kasus seperti subordinat, stereotipe, dan lainnya akan terus terjadi. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif denganmetode fenomenologi di beberapa organisasi masyarakat Islam bersamaan dengan badan otonomnya. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa sejak dulu sampai sekarang posisi perempuan tidak banyak berubah. Hak-hak yang melekat pada perempuan direproduksi oleh publik yang memunculkan marginalisasi dan stereotipe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".