MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390450078 · doi:10.1142/s0218127423501973

Infinitely Many Coexisting Attractors and Scrolls in a Fractional-Order Discrete Neuron Map

2023· article· en· W4390450078 on OpenAlexaff
Lujie Ren, Lei Qin, Hadi Jahanshahi, Jun Mou

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsProfessional Engineers Ontario
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAttractorRealizabilityArtificial neural networkNonlinear systemDynamical systems theoryChaoticMathematicsFractional calculusDynamical system (definition)Computer scienceApplied mathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The neural network activation functions enable neural networks to have stronger fitting abilities and richer dynamical behaviors. In this paper, an improved fractional-order discrete tabu learning neuron (FODTLN) model map with a nonlinear periodic function as the activation function is proposed. The fixed points of the map are discussed. Then, the rich and complex dynamical behaviors of the map under different parameters and order conditions are investigated by using some common nonlinear dynamical analysis methods combined with the fractional-order approximate entropy method. Furthermore, it is found that fractional-order differential operators affect the generation of multiscrolls, and the model has infinitely many coexisting attractors obtained by changing the initial conditions. Interestingly, attractor growth and state transition are found. Finally, the map is implemented on the DSP hardware platforms to verify the realizability. The results show that the map exhibits complex and interesting dynamical behaviors. It provides a fundamental theory for the research of artificial neural networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207