Identical metamorphic record in distinct petrochemical systems: Case study of microscopically interlayered garnet amphibolite and metapelite from the Danba dome, SW China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is known that different metamorphic rocks may have different abilities in recording metamorphic processes. Here, we report microscopically interlayered garnet amphibolite and metapelite layers in a rock from the Danba dome in eastern Tibetan Plateau, SW China. Both rock types exhibit similar garnet zoning patterns, biotite and plagioclase compositions, as well as peak P-T conditions (7.3–8.0 kbar / 700–725 °C for metapelite and 7.1–8.4 kbar / 690–710 °C for garnet amphibolite, respectively), indicating a global thermodynamic equilibrium state and the same metamorphic record of the two distinct layers. However, medium-sized garnet exhibits homogeneous core compositions and biotite preserves lower Ti and Fe# [= Fe2+ / (Fe2+ + Mg)] at the lithological interface, possibly indicating more intense chemical homogenization at the metamorphic peak and retrograde modification at the interface caused by the possible presence of vast fluid. Sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) UPb dating of metamorphic zircon show a wide dispersion of ages (c. 200–155 Ma), overlapping previous age data reported for this region. These results indicate that differences in petrochemical compositions may not lead to significant distortion in the metamorphic records, including garnet zoning patterns and peak P-T conditions. This further suggests that metamorphic rocks originating from diverse protoliths, which exhibit varying peak P-T conditions within the same locality, could either be a result of the tectonic juxtaposition of distinct tectonic slices or the influence of varying fluid conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".