Exploration of the Path of College Students' Self-worth Realisation under the Perspective of Humanistic Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Along with the development of our society and the progress of education, the integration of psychological theory in college education has become one of the important contents of educational reform.Among them, Maslow's humanistic theory occupies a place in psychology. The main content of humanistic theory is: in the process of growth and development, people need to be fully affirmed their own value, dignity and self-realization needs.The theory of humanism holds that all human beings have potential, which needs to be realized and developed.College students are an important force for the development of our country. However, with the rapid development of economy and constant change of society, they have not only had many opportunities and hopes in the process of realizing their self-worth, but also faced severe challenges and tests.In order to help college students correctly understand the connotation of self-value and realize the all-round development of their own quality, they should be actively guided in psychological thought to lead them to realize their self-value.This paper analyzes and discusses how to use humanism theory to lead college students to realize their self-value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".