Structural characterization of the Sel1‐like repeat protein <scp>LceB</scp> from <scp> <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> </scp>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Legionella are freshwater Gram-negative bacteria that in their normal environment infect protozoa. However, this adaptation also allows Legionella to infect human alveolar macrophages and cause pneumonia. Central to Legionella pathogenesis are more than 330 secreted effectors, of which there are nine core effectors that are conserved in all pathogenic species. Despite their importance, the biochemical function of several core effectors remains unclear. To address this, we have taken a structural approach to characterize the core effector of unknown function LceB, or Lpg1356, from Legionella pneumophila. Here, we solve an X-ray crystal structure of LceB using an AlphaFold model for molecular replacement. The experimental structure shows that LceB adopts a Sel1-like repeat (SLR) fold as predicted. However, the crystal structure captured multiple conformations of LceB, all of which differed from the AlphaFold model. A comparison of the predicted model and the experimental models suggests that LceB is highly flexible in solution. Additionally, the molecular analysis of LceB using its close structural homologs reveals sequence and structural motifs of known biochemical function. Specifically, LceB harbors a repeated KAAEQG motif that both stabilizes the SLR fold and is known to participate in protein-protein interactions with eukaryotic host proteins. We also observe that LceB forms several higher-order oligomers in solution. Overall, our results have revealed that LceB has conformational flexibility, self-associates, and contains a molecular surface for binding a target host-cell protein. Additionally, our data provides structural insights into the SLR family of proteins that remain poorly studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".