MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimized Machine Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System for Internet of Vehicles

2023· article· en· W4390482500 on OpenAlexaff
Elnaz Limouchi, François Chan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceIntrusion detection systemHyperparameterGradient boostingBoosting (machine learning)Extreme learning machineClassifier (UML)Feature selectionBayesian networkArtificial neural networkRandom forest

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Vehicles (IoV) represents the application of Internet of Things (IoT) within vehicular communication environments. Internet of vehicles refers to a network of interconnected sensors, network layers, and communication systems that enable vehicles to connect with everything (V2X communication). Io V networks face numerous security challenges due to the emergence of modern types of attacks with unusual patterns. Therefore, it is a crucial and demanding task to design intelligent Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) for Io V networks. In this paper, we propose an optimized Machine Learning-based IDS to detect attacks in Io V networks. We deploy highly efficient Ma-chine Learning models, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Extra Trees Classifier, and Extreme Gradient Boosting, to detect attacks in the CICDDoS2019 dataset. We apply the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique to resolve the issue of imbalanced data distribution of target class. A Correlation-based Feature Selection is conducted to reduce the computational cost by decreasing the number of input variables. In order to enhance the performance of the attack detection, hyperparameters are optimized using the Bayesian Optimization algorithm. The performance evaluation results show that these ML models perform well. Notably, the Extreme Gradient Boosting classifier outperforms other Machine Learning models, and our proposed solution outperforms existing systems in terms of Accuracy score.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207