Comorbidity Profiling in Rural and Urban Population of West Bengal, India: Report From a Community-Based Primary Healthcare System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is fast changing across the world, especially in the context of rapid urbanization, adoption of Western lifestyles, and an aging multi-morbid population. Over the last three decades, India has undergone a significant demographic and socioeconomic transition. For effective targeting of health system resources and services, it is essential to understand how the prevalence of NCDs varies among population groups across India. We set out to understand the distribution of NCDs and co-morbidities in urban and rural West Bengal. Methods As part of a service improvement project, data was collected from four urban and four rural community-based clinics across West Bengal, India. The reason for visiting the healthcare center was recorded as the primary diagnosis and co-morbidities were recorded per the Elixhauser comorbidity scoring criteria. Associations between all the demographic variables and NCDs were studied using the Poisson regression model and multivariate analysis. Demographic profile, co-morbidities, and Elixhauser comorbidity index were expressed as frequency (%), mean (standard deviation, SD), or median (interquartile range, IQR) as appropriate. Results We obtained data from 1244 patients of which 886 (71%) were from urban areas and 358 (29%) were from rural areas. Patients were mostly female (61%) and had a mean (SD) age of 53 (11) years. There was a positive correlation between living in an urban residence and age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and respiratory disease. There was a positive correlation between CVD and age, male sex, living in an urban residence, and hypertension but did not correlate positively with diabetes. BMI positively correlated with living in an urban residence, hypertension, diabetes, and musculoskeletal disorders. We observed a significantly higher prevalence of musculoskeletal (p=0.002) and psychological diseases (p<0.001) in the rural population, while the prevalence of hypertension (p<0.001) and respiratory diseases among the participants living in urban areas was higher (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of diabetes between urban and rural areas (p=0.38). In the multivariable analyses, we observed that increased age, being overweight, and living in urban areas were associated with hypertension (prevalence ratio (PR): 1.40, 1.30, and 1.30, respectively; all p-values <0.05). An interaction between sex and living area was associated with a lower prevalence of musculoskeletal diseases (PR: 0.34; 95%CI: 0.18-0.66), i.e., musculoskeletal diseases were less prevalent in males living in urban areas (p=0.002). Conclusion There is a rise in multimorbidity with changing demographic patterns and a narrowing of the urban-rural gap in disease distribution. More investment is required in risk factor prevention, screening, and treatment, with greater accessibility of healthcare resources for those in rural areas. Further work needs to be done to study the trends and distribution of NCDs in West Bengal to inform healthcare policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".