MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390510313 · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44437-y

CRISPR-Cas-based identification of a sialylated human milk oligosaccharides utilization cluster in the infant gut commensal Bacteroides dorei

2024· article· en· W4390510313 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sivan Kijner, Dena Ennis, Shimrit Shmorak, Anat Florentin, Moran Yassour

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDSM Nutritional ProductsMinistry of Health, State of IsraelAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsBacteroidesBiologyBifidobacteriumMicrobiomeBacteroides thetaiotaomicronCRISPRGut floraComplementationMicrobiologyGeneImmunologyBacteriaGeneticsPhenotypeLactobacillus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The infant gut microbiome is impacted by early-life feeding, as human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) found in breastmilk cannot be digested by infants and serve as nutrients for their gut bacteria. While the vast majority of HMO-utilization research has focused on Bifidobacterium species, recent studies have suggested additional HMO-utilizers, mostly Bacteroides, yet their utilization mechanism is poorly characterized. Here, we investigate Bacteroides dorei isolates from breastfed-infants and identify that polysaccharide utilization locus (PUL) 33 enables B. dorei to utilize sialylated HMOs. We perform transcriptional profiling and identity upregulated genes when growing on sialylated HMOs. Using CRISPR-Cas12 to knock-out four PUL33 genes, combined with complementation assays, we identify GH33 as the critical gene in PUL33 for sialylated HMO-utilization. This demonstration of an HMO-utilization system by Bacteroides species isolated from infants opens the way to further characterization of additional such systems, to better understand HMO-utilization in the infant gut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207