The Impact of Reduced Non-technical Distribution Losses on GHG Emissions by Implementing Advanced Metering Infrastructure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distribution losses in the electrical system demonstrate the reliability and efficacy of the network in providing electricity to the customers. The PLN Statistical Report 2022 stated that 20,236 GWh of electricity became losses at PLN’s distribution network across Indonesia. Not only causing the financial disadvantage, but these losses are also believed to have an adverse effect on the environment since they raise the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions because energy losses need to be compensated. Thus, various initiatives are conducted to improve the performance of distribution network system, including in Bali. In attempt to minimize losses, PLN Bali Distribution Unit has gradually implemented Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) technology throughout 2023. This research is supposed to examine the impact of the AMI installation on the value of losses and GHG emissions. Our findings suggest that AMI technology has a positive impact on non-technical losses but an insignificant impact on total losses, defying the widely held belief that it can notably reduce losses. The environmental impact then can be quantified by converting the losses value to GHG emissions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it